Draft bill 115.

Awaiting committee adoption
  • TypeDraft bill
  • 115
  • FiledAugust 5, 2026

Summary.

The draft bill establishes an obligation to restore in full to the State public money, property, funds, assets, and resources appropriated, diverted, misappropriated, improperly paid, or used to the detriment of public assets, when established by a final criminal judgment. Its stated object concerns the offenses against public administration identified in Title X, Chapters 1, II, III, V, and IX of the Criminal Code (Código Penal). Restitution would operate alongside applicable penalties, security measures, forfeiture, civil liability arising from the offense, and other legal consequences.

The obligation would apply to natural or legal persons, whether Panamanian or foreign, convicted by a final criminal judgment of offenses under Title X of the Criminal Code. For a legal person, its legal representatives, directors, officers, managers, or employees would be covered only if the judgment declares their responsibility. Public resources whose illicit origin is established by that judgment could be identified, traced, and pursued for recovery despite intervening transactions, transfers, conveyances, or disposals, subject to the rights of good faith third-party purchasers. The bill states that it complements the Criminal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code (Código Procesal Penal), and makes restitution enforceable only upon a final judgment declaring criminal responsibility.

Restitution would cover the proceeds, gains, or economic benefits of the offense and property recoverable under the preceding rules. It could be effected through voluntary return, which would leave other liabilities intact, or compulsory enforcement. Enforcement mechanisms include attachment or seizure, forfeiture, sale of recovered property, joint and several liability as determined by the competent authority, and payment agreements authorized by the competent court that preserve the full obligation. A conviction would trigger the disqualifications provided by law for holding public office and for contracting with the State or participating in contractor selection procedures. It would also lead to exclusion or disqualification from State registers of prospective bidders, bidders, or contractors for the period specified in the judgment or by law.

The court would forward a restitution judgment on its own initiative to the General Directorate of Revenue (Dirección General de Ingresos) within the Ministry of Economy and Finance (Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas), the Office of the Comptroller General of the Republic (Contraloría General de la República), and the affected public entity. The General Directorate of Revenue would record the amount as an enforceable debt and pursue collection under the Tax Code (Código Fiscal). If a payment agreement is breached, it could report the outstanding obligation to credit history reporting agencies under Law 24 of May 22, 2002 (Ley 24 de 22 de mayo de 2002), as amended, within the three (3) business days following the determination of breach.

Implementation would fall, within their respective powers, to the Public Prosecutor's Office (Ministerio Público), the Judiciary (Órgano Judicial), the Office of the Comptroller General of the Republic, the General Directorate of Revenue within the Ministry of Economy and Finance, the National Authority for Transparency and Access to Information (Autoridad Nacional de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información, ANTAI), and other competent public entities. The Executive Branch would issue implementing regulations within no more than six (6) months from promulgation, and the law would take effect upon publication in the Official Gazette. The provisions could concern affected public entities, credit reporting agencies, and sectors that contract with the State.

What it proposes.

  • Restitution to the State of public resources connected with offenses against public administration.
  • Recovery, enforcement, and collection of the restitution obligation.
  • Effects of conviction on public office and State contracting.
  • Transmission of judgments and reporting of breached payment agreements.

Who it would affect.

  • Natural or legal persons, domestic or foreign, convicted by a final criminal judgment.
  • Representatives and personnel of legal persons whose responsibility is declared in the judgment.
  • Persons who participated in obtaining illicit resources or benefited from them when joint and several liability is determined.
  • Public entities responsible for recovery, collection, and oversight.

Key points.

  1. Full restitution of public resources to the State becomes enforceable following a final criminal judgment for the specified offenses.Art. 1
  2. The obligation covers convicted natural or legal persons; representatives and personnel of legal persons are covered if the judgment declares their responsibility.Art. 2
  3. Property whose illicit origin is established by judgment may be pursued after transfers or other disposals, subject to the rights of good faith third parties.Art. 3
  4. Restitution covers the economic benefit of the offense and may proceed through voluntary return or compulsory enforcement, including payment agreements that preserve the full obligation.Arts. 5-6
  5. Conviction triggers disqualifications from public office and State contracting, as well as exclusion or disqualification from registers of prospective bidders, bidders, or contractors.Arts. 7-10
  6. The court forwards the judgment to the designated entities, and the General Directorate of Revenue records and collects the specified amount as an enforceable debt.Art. 8
  7. Breach of a payment agreement may be reported to credit history reporting agencies within the three (3) business days following the determination of breach.Art. 9
  8. Implementation is assigned to competent public entities, and the Executive Branch must issue regulations within no more than six (6) months.Arts. 11-12